How could one explain oneself ...                                 WHAT THE SOUL IS – AND HOW "SPIRIT" AND METAPHYSICS SHOULD BE USED

 

The soul is not to be equated with the psyche because it is believed in transcendental elements.

 

Of course, the belief in a soul can also be a midpoint in the psyche and thereby influence other neuronal networks.

 

 

This is particularly true of the religious, metaphysical issues that can provoke a self-fulfilling prophecy in the person through which he sees the world as it was prophesied. And what can change his psyche and consequently his body.

 

 

I also generally use "spirit", such as "mental faculties", in the sense of the human psyche. So not lifted, but down to earth.

 

 

And on metaphysics:

Metaphysics is a sought-after belief that is supposed to refute the definition:

Law means that identical parts - or waves - always result in identical structures under identical circumstances. Laws are inherent properties of substances that - viewed in isolation - are unchangeable (apart from the basic possibilities for modification contained in them) as long as nothing is added to or removed from the substances.
And that means that everything can only take place in a very specific legal form.
Substances and laws belong together directly and inseparably. There are no substances without laws.

 

The formula: substances = laws is universal.

One would like other (metaphysical) truths to be hidden behind such obvious truths. This is somewhat similar to looking for God. Both strive for dream fulfillment.

 

 

With metaphysics, mankind has not advanced a single step in knowledge for 2000 years. This way of seeing the world is a playground for some philosophers, who can claim (without having to - or being able to) provide evidence - whatever comes to their mind.

 

 

Metaphysics calls itself a science. In other words: it creates knowledge. This is certainly not the case because everything she says is unverifiable. But it creates faith; self-felt belief.


 

 

 

 

 

How could one 

explain oneself...

 

altruism

 

anchor

 

atheist

 

attachment in children

 

Body-mind separation

 

Brain (and its “operational

 

secret")

 

Brain (how it works)

 

brain flexibility

 

Brain versus computer

 

chaos

 

chosen

 

consciousness (description)

 

conscience

 

common sense

 

Complexes

 

creativity / intuition

 

Descendants

 

De-escalation

 

depression

 

Determinism

 

distraction / priming

 

Dreams

 

Empathy / sympathy

 

fall asleep

 

fate

 

feelings (origin)

 

First impression

 

emotional perceptions (feelings and emotionality)

 

forget (looking for)

 

frame

 

Free will

 

freedom

 

frontal lobe

 

future

 

growth

 

gut feeling

 

Habits

 

Inheritance, Genetics, Epigenetics

 

Heuristics

 

How the world came into being

 

How values arise

 

Ideas (unintentional)

 

Immanuel Kant

 

Inheritance, Genetics, Epigenetics

 

karma

 

Love

 

Location of the goals

 

Meditation (relaxation)

 

Midpoint-mechanics (function and explanation)

 

Mind

 

Mirror neurons

 

near-death experiences

 

objective and subjective

 

Panic

 

perception

 

Perfection

 

placedos

 

prejudice

 

primordial structures

 

Prophecy, self-fulfilling

 

psyche (Definition and representation)

 

Qualia-Problem

 

Rage on oneself

 

See only black or white

 

sleep

 

the SELF (definition)

 

Self-control

 

[sense of] self-esteem

 

self-size

 

Similarities

 

Self-knowledge

 

soul / spirit

 

Substances and laws (definition)

 

Superstition

 

thinking

 

trauma

 

truth and faith

 

Values

 

yin and yang

 

 

What kind of reader would you characterize yourself as?

 

1. I can't understand this.

2. I don't want to understand that because it doesn't fit my own worldview. (So, not to the aims that created this.)

3. I use my cognitive abilities to understand it.

4. I has judged beforehand and thinks I alredy understands everything.